Where does the thesis go in a rogerian argument
On Rogerian Argument adapted from Rhetoric Matters: Language and Argument in Context by Megan McIntyre and Curtis Le Van Rogerian argument is often difficult for students to understand because it asks them to think about controversial topics in a different way: from the perspective of someone they disagree with.
For example, are you absolutely certain that abortion is immoral under all circumstances? Secondly, state the issue or matter at hand to be settled or fixed.
Indicate the beliefs and values that you share. Instead, you explore ways that will allow both you and your audience to win. He believed that with the help of empathy, people can find the right solution even when their statements are controversial.
Rogerian argument activity
Because you need to adopt a nonthreatening persona throughout your essay, however, avoid dogmatically presenting your view as the best or only way to solve the problem. Do I want to persuade tennis players that we need to throw away the wide-body power rackets and go back to the days of wooden rackets because power tennis is killing finesse tennis? This will help you to formalize the main points for your argument and identify any opposing views. Because of the emotionally charged context of your communication situation, you still need to maintain the same open-minded persona that you established in the introductory paragraphs. To achieve the nonthreatening tone needed to diffuse emotional situations, avoid exaggerating your claims or using biased, emotional language. Or could I promote harmony in a local or campus conflict? Violent video games make children violent.
Are there any sports-related topics that I could tackle? Part 1: Opponent's view The thesis exposed by Mr.
Rogerian arguments essays
A Rogerian essay is an essay which presents a contentious or debatable topic using an impartial language. Threat hinders communication. In such a manner, your essay will be well-structured and harmonic. What makes a Rogerian thesis different from a regular thesis is that it presented only after the writer has conceded that opposite viewpoints exist and that they have some merit. For example, can you imagine how your roomate would respond if you remark that he or she is a terrible slob? In a situation like this, the writer should approach the audience in a non-threatening way; the argument depends on it. His works became a fundament for the interesting strategy that is called the Rogerian argument.
It can be considered a psychological attack on your readers who have a controversial opinion. You have to support your theses with data, statistics, or any kind of reliable information for example, to show what is the percentage of terrorists among the refugees from Syria.
This Rogerian process started to make its way into textbooks in You immediately sit up in your seat, hoping for some sort of elaboration on how to write a Rogerian essay, or at least an explanation of what it is.
based on 113 review